Healthcare · Compliance
Stark and Anti-Kickback physician arrangements
The contract-operations view. Physician compensation arrangements turn on documented Fair Market Value, commercial reasonableness, and approvals that must exist when the arrangement is signed, not reconstructed during an audit.
Regulatory requirements for contract management
These are the requirements that bear on contracts and the contract record. It is general information, not legal advice.
- Physician compensation arrangements that implicate the Stark Law must satisfy an applicable exception (42 CFR 411.357); Stark is strict liability, so intent is not required.
- Arrangements that implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute (42 USC 1320a-7b(b)) should be structured and documented to address AKS risk, including a safe harbor where one fits (42 CFR 1001.952).
- Fair Market Value and commercial reasonableness are core requirements in many Stark compensation exceptions and key evidence in AKS risk analysis.
- The writing requirement may be satisfied by a collection of contemporaneous documents (42 CFR 411.354); the FMV and approval record should exist when the arrangement is approved, not after.
How a compliant program operates
The contract-side cadence a well-run program runs on.
- Pre-execution compliance review and approval, with the approval tier calibrated to the magnitude of the arrangement.
- Cumulative aggregation of each physician’s total compensation across every arrangement, tracked against benchmark and feasible work hours.
- A contemporaneous Fair Market Value file: valuation opinion, business rationale, commercial-reasonableness documentation, benchmark references, and approval signatures, with all-party signatures before payment.
- Annual refresh against current benchmarks, with out-of-cycle triggers for scope, compensation, role change, new arrangements, or mergers and acquisitions.
- Audit response readiness: the full arrangement set per physician produced on demand.
Is your physician-arrangements record audit-ready?
If you cannot check every box, the whitepaper shows how leading programs close the gap.
How Contract Logix supports the work
Contract Logix runs a pre-execution review and approval workflow with no-code conditional branching that routes each arrangement to the appropriate reviewer tier once the benchmark percentile is captured, holds the arrangements registry with a consolidated per-physician view and a configurable Stark and Anti-Kickback compliance matrix, keeps the Fair Market Value documentation together as a contract binder, and drives annual renewal alerts and event-triggered notifications. Explore the repository, workflow, the Contract Intelligence Engine, and the Contract Intelligence Dashboard.
Get the full Stark and Anti-Kickback arrangements whitepaper
The whitepaper covers the operational requirements, the regulatory citations and deadlines, and where compliance programs most often fall short, with the contract-operations view throughout.
Frequently asked questions
Does Contract Logix determine Fair Market Value?
No. Fair Market Value opinions come from your valuation source. Contract Logix holds the Fair Market Value file and the approval record together with the arrangement.
Can approvals be tiered by the size of the arrangement?
Yes. Conditional workflow routes each arrangement to the reviewer tier your policy defines once the benchmark percentile is on the record.
Does it track a physician’s arrangements in aggregate?
Yes. A per-physician view rolls up every arrangement for review against benchmark and feasible work hours.
Disclaimer. This page is general information about the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute and contract operations. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult qualified counsel for advice on your obligations.
